The comments under the title 'Of partridges, pheasants and White-headed Ducks' (Brit. Birds 89: 241) are, I submit, not worthy of your excellent magazine. Although the opinions are 'not necessarily those of "British Birds'", the complete lack of documentation or attribution sits uncomfortably alongside the evident care and scholarship found through the rest of the magazine. What use are opinions, howeve
...This article is only available to registered users.
To read more, please log in or purchase a subscription.
